{"id":44645,"date":"2022-04-07T13:18:31","date_gmt":"2022-04-07T17:18:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/?p=44645"},"modified":"2022-04-07T13:18:31","modified_gmt":"2022-04-07T17:18:31","slug":"the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/","title":{"rendered":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Andy<\/a>

Andy Warhol<\/p><\/div>\n

Andy Warhol is known for many things, soup cans and flowers among them. But his portraits are often cited as some of the pop art icon\u2019s most recognizable works. From Marilyn Monroe to Mao Zedong to Mick Jagger, Andy Warhol seems to have immortalized every great cultural figure of the twentieth century in neon-colored silkscreen. Among Warhol\u2019s portrait subjects, the musician and 1980s icon Prince is just one of many. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.<\/span><\/p>\n

It all started in 2016 following Prince\u2019s death, when <\/span>Vanity Fair<\/span><\/i> published an article on the late musician. Accompanying the article was a number of colorful portraits of Prince done by Andy Warhol in the years leading up to the artist’s 1987 death. That\u2019s when Lynn Goldsmith noticed something out of place. Warhol’s portraits bore a striking resemblance to a photo she had taken of Prince in 1981. Lynn Goldsmith is a musician and a photographer known for having taken photos of many celebrities and public figures. While she may occasionally snap a picture of Hillary Clinton or the Dalai Lama, she\u2019s always been a musical photographer at heart. Singers and musicians are her most common subjects, including Bob Dylan, Keith Richards, Michael Jackson, and Bruce Springsteen. She\u2019s also taken pictures for a number of recognizable album covers, most iconically Frank Zappa\u2019s <\/span>Sheik Yerbouti<\/span><\/i><\/a>. But the center of this legal battle has to do with <\/span>Goldsmith\u2019s 1981 black-and-white portrait of Prince<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

Goldsmith originally licensed the photo to <\/span>Vanity Fair<\/span><\/i> in 1984 for use in an article about Prince entitled \u201c<\/span>Purple Fame<\/span><\/a>\u201d. The magazine then reached out to Warhol to create a portrait based on Goldsmith\u2019s photograph. The Warhol portrait accompanied the article, but <\/span>Vanity Fair<\/span><\/i> credited Goldsmith for the original work. However, Warhol went on to create an additional <\/span>fifteen portraits<\/span><\/a> of Prince based on the original photograph without Goldsmith\u2019s permission. After discovering this, Goldsmith reached out to the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (AWF), the organization that holds the copyright to all Warhol works. It seems her efforts to remedy the situation failed, because she then registered the original photo with the US Copyright Office. The AWF sued, while Goldsmith countersued, starting the legal battle that has continued to the present day.<\/span><\/p>\n

In New York federal court, Judge John Koeltl ruled that although photographs are copyrightable, \u201cthe subject itself \u2013 and general features of that subject \u2013 are not.\u201d Furthermore, Judge Koeltl wrote that Goldsmith doesn\u2019t really have a case against the AWF because of Warhol\u2019s transformation of the original photograph. The changes that Warhol made \u201cresult[ed] in an aesthetic and character different from the original. The Prince Series works can reasonably be perceived to have transformed Prince from a vulnerable, uncomfortable person to an iconic, larger-than-life figure.\u201d This decision, however, was overturned on appeal. The panel of appellate judges ruled that a secondary work being transformative cannot be determined just by the artist\u2019s intent or the perceptions of the work. \u201c[W]hether a work is transformative cannot turn merely on the stated or perceived intent of the artist or the meaning or impression that a critic \u2013 or for that matter, a judge \u2013 draws from the work. Were it otherwise, the law may well \u2018recogniz[e] any alteration as transformative.\u2019\u201d Faced with this new ruling, the AWF has appealed to the Supreme Court, who <\/span>agreed to hear the case<\/span><\/a>\u00a0this past Monday.<\/span><\/p>\n

A group of professors of both copyright and art law, as well as lawyers representing the Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, the Roy Lichtenstein Foundation, and the Brooklyn Museum, have already submitted briefs to the Supreme Court supporting the AWF\u2019s case against Goldsmith. While the AWF wants to portray the situation as artistic free expression under siege by some random photographer and the US legal system, what this case really deals with is simple: fair use within the context of copyright. These cases are context-based, and even if the justices side with Goldsmith, by no means will it create a new case law precedent for future free use copyright disputes. In law, there are certain circumstances where the free use justification is applicable, like <\/span>commentary or journalism. No author is going to sue a literary critic because they used a quote from one of their books in a review. But taking someone else\u2019s photograph, making an exact copy via screenprint, and then just changing the color is, by most people\u2019s definition, not a wholly original work and is a clear and blatant infringement of copyright. The AWF is just making a fuss over a mistake their namesake made, and now they don\u2019t want to look bad in front of everyone.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Andy Warhol is known for many things, soup cans and flowers among them. But his portraits are often cited as some of the pop art icon\u2019s most recognizable works. From Marilyn Monroe to Mao Zedong to Mick Jagger, Andy Warhol … More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":44647,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,1],"tags":[224,72,142,367,269,120,11,9,175],"class_list":["post-44645","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-rehs-galleries","category-rehs-contemporary","tag-20th-century-american-art","tag-american-art","tag-court","tag-crime-and-punishment","tag-legal-matters","tag-modern-art","tag-rehs-contemporary-news","tag-rehs-galleries-news","tag-warhol"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff - Rehs Galleries<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rehs Galleries\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RehsGalleriesInc\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"680\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"922\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nathan Scheer\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nathan Scheer\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nathan Scheer\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1d33fd182b28afdad8fc3548ffe6bdc4\"},\"headline\":\"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":809,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"20th Century American Art\",\"American Art\",\"court\",\"Crime and Punishment\",\"Legal Matters\",\"Modern Art\",\"Rehs Contemporary - Art World News\",\"Rehs Galleries - Art World News\",\"warhol\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Rehs 19th & 20th\",\"Rehs Contemporary\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff - Rehs Galleries\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00\",\"description\":\"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg\",\"width\":680,\"height\":922,\"caption\":\"Andy Warhol\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/2022\\\/04\\\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rehs Galleries\",\"description\":\"Offering and acquiring high quality paintings in excellent condition. Family owned and operated for more than 80 years!\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Rehs Galleries\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/indexlogo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/indexlogo.jpg\",\"width\":153,\"height\":85,\"caption\":\"Rehs Galleries\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/RehsGalleriesInc\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/rehsgalleries\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rehsgalleries\\\/?hl=en\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/rehscontemporary\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/twitter.com\\\/rehscgi\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/rehscontemporary\\\/?hl=en\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/rehs.com\\\/eng\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/1d33fd182b28afdad8fc3548ffe6bdc4\",\"name\":\"Nathan Scheer\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nathan Scheer\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff - Rehs Galleries","description":"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff","og_description":"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.","og_url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/","og_site_name":"Rehs Galleries","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RehsGalleriesInc","article_published_time":"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":680,"height":922,"url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nathan Scheer","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nathan Scheer","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/"},"author":{"name":"Nathan Scheer","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/1d33fd182b28afdad8fc3548ffe6bdc4"},"headline":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff","datePublished":"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/"},"wordCount":809,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg","keywords":["20th Century American Art","American Art","court","Crime and Punishment","Legal Matters","Modern Art","Rehs Contemporary - Art World News","Rehs Galleries - Art World News","warhol"],"articleSection":["Rehs 19th & 20th","Rehs Contemporary"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/","url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/","name":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff - Rehs Galleries","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-07T17:18:31+00:00","description":"From Marilyn to Mao to Mick, Andy Warhol immortalized every great 20th century cultural figure in neon-colored silkscreen. But it\u2019s a Warhol portrait of Prince that\u2019s the subject of an upcoming US Supreme Court case.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/Andy_Warhol_1975.jpg","width":680,"height":922,"caption":"Andy Warhol"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/2022\/04\/the-warhol-supreme-court-faceoff\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Warhol Supreme Court Faceoff"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#website","url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/","name":"Rehs Galleries","description":"Offering and acquiring high quality paintings in excellent condition. Family owned and operated for more than 80 years!","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#organization","name":"Rehs Galleries","url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/indexlogo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/indexlogo.jpg","width":153,"height":85,"caption":"Rehs Galleries"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/RehsGalleriesInc","https:\/\/x.com\/rehsgalleries","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rehsgalleries\/?hl=en","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/rehscontemporary\/","https:\/\/twitter.com\/rehscgi","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/rehscontemporary\/?hl=en"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/#\/schema\/person\/1d33fd182b28afdad8fc3548ffe6bdc4","name":"Nathan Scheer","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e4fb9a1b35fd037d8f1a71aa5d753cf11c6ac1fc1663ed6ba66706ccb4fee0c8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nathan Scheer"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44645","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44645"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44645\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/44647"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44645"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44645"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rehs.com\/eng\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44645"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}